Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2501 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4460 - 142 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$119.95 vs CA$196.23
- Up to 30% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.96 vs CA$1.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9675 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
125
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9675 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |