Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4130 - 213 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$78.88 vs CA$196.23
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.4 vs CA$0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2630 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
198
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$78.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$78.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2631 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |