Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1293 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 218 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$181.91 vs CA$196.23
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
218
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5773 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
203
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$181.91
100%
Buy for CA$181.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5773 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |