Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i5-10400 - 284 vs 276 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$174.99 vs CA$196.23
- Up to 9% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.63 vs CA$0.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
284
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
91%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3241 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
276
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |