Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1460 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$78.88 vs CA$194.24
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i3-4130 - 182 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$78.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
85.18835616438356%
Multi-Core
1960
33.82809803244736%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |