Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - CA$98.43 vs CA$209.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-11400 - CA$0.93 vs CA$1.5 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 32% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6100 - 140 vs 106 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
106
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.5/FPS
62%
Price, CA$
CA$209.99
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |