Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 65% better in War Thunder than FX-8150 - 213 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - CA$87.12 vs CA$209.99
- Up to 31% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-11400 - CA$0.68 vs CA$0.99 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
68%
Price, CA$
CA$209.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
129
60%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |