Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2327 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon X5675 - 340 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 64 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | EPYC |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 32 |
| 12 | Threads | 64 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
