Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1302 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Xeon X5675 - 116 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 85 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
