Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3201 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon X5675 - 503 vs 449 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
