Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is 2975 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Performs up to 11% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon X5675 - 157 vs 141 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
