Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3123 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon W3680 - 179 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 24 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |