Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 5046 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon W3680 - 210 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4844 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |