Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1086 days older than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon Silver 4116 - 119 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon Silver 4116 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon Silver 4116
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon Silver | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
