Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 862 days newer than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 1% better in Dishonored 2 than Xeon Silver 4116 - 261 vs 259 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon Silver 4116 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon Silver 4116
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon Silver | Collection | Athlon |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
