Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 546 days newer than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon Silver 4116 - 177 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon Silver 4116 - 15 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon Silver 4116
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon Silver | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
