Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 12 days older than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 85 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in New World than Xeon Silver 4116 - 104 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon Silver 4116 - 64 vs 24 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon Silver 4116
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon Silver | Collection | EPYC |
| Skylake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 12 | Cores | 32 |
| 24 | Threads | 64 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
