Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v3 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v3 is 1302 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon X5675 - 168 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 95 vs 135 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon |
| Haswell | Codename | Westmere-EP |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
