Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v3 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v3 is 1581 days older than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 3700U - 199 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 15 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
