Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v3 outperforms Core i7-5600U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v3 is 174 days older than Core i7-5600U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-5600U - 174 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5600U - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5600U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 15 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-5600U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-5600U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
