Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v3 outperforms Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v3 is 372 days newer than Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4130T - 179 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 35 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
135 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |