Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 is 419 days older than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Performs up to 1% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - 142 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3662 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |