Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 is 231 days older than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8300 - 321 vs 318 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6932 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |