Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 1876 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 90 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 303 vs 287 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 127 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
