Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 851 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than EPYC 7551P - 184 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 127 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 64 vs 16 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | EPYC |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
