Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 1876 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 13% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 222 vs 197 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 127 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
