Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 49 days older than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 116 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
