Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Xeon E5-2609 v3 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 85 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 131 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 20 vs 6 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
