Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1899 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 199 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
