Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3550H is 1581 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 99 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 3550H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3550H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
