Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v4 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v4 is 437 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |