Buy on Amazon
$98.15
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $406
Availability
MSRP in USD: $406
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v4 is 1112 days older than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Ryzen 5 3400G - 185 vs 183 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
183
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4-core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon RX Graphics
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1630 v4 or Ryzen 5 3400G
Rust, 1920 x 1080, High
12 FPS
$69.08/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 5 3400G
8 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$829
In Stock
1 FPS
$699/FPS
Radeon RX Vega 11
Ryzen 5 3400G
16 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
