Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1410 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 109 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12479 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |