Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 2130 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $136.62 vs $284.99
- Up to 39% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $1.92 vs $3.17 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 27% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 90 vs 71 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
71
78%
Value, $/FPS
$1.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.17/FPS
60%
Price, $
$284.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $284.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |