Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1336 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-6300 - 475 vs 451 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 75% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $58.02 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77624 minutes ago
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |