Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $74.04 vs $255.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.5 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 66% better in F1 23 than FX-6300 - 246 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 20 vs 6 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Buy for $255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |