Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 545 vs 526 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $81.79 vs $255.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-10900KF - $0.16 vs $0.47 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
526
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |