Buy on Amazon
$39.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 is 1612 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
455
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
