Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 is 425 days older than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Celeron G550 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $104 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |