Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1550 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E3-1240 - 166 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6421 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |