Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1885 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 80 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1240 - 234 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9971 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |