Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220L v2 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220L v2 is 350 days older than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 6 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |