Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2908 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 174 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |