Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $61.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Control than Core i3-10320 - $0.31 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Pentium G3250 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 8 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9426 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9426 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |