Key Differences
In short — Core M-5Y51 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core M-5Y51 is 546 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than FX-6350 - 684 vs 674 FPS
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 4 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 6 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4034 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core M | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |