Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1039 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 4 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than Core M-5Y51 - 178 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |