Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1610 - 146 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $37.0 vs $232.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-11900KF - $0.32 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $232 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13117 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |