Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 65% better in Starfield than FX-4130 - 71 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $52.02 vs $229.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |