Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 158 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $59.4 vs $229.99
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75915 minutes ago
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
54.35283279594657%
Multi-Core
5480
59.753571039145136%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |