Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 46% better in Rust than Core i3-3240 - 230 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $41.0 vs $210.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-11900F - $0.26 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15269 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15269 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |